Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 47
Filter
1.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 48(11): 1231-1232, 2022 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20243223
2.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 49(2): 133-141, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20238060

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical opinions and practice patterns of delegates to the ESCRS. SETTING: Clinical Trends Surveys were administered during annual ESCRS congresses held between 2016 and 2021, and data collected online and in-person. DESIGN: Survey questions addressed several specialty areas, including cataract surgery, presbyopia-correcting and toric intraocular lenses (IOLs), ocular surface disease, and glaucoma. METHODS: Survey results were compared and analyzed across 6 years. 4 main profile questions were used for cross-tabulation analyses of questions pertaining to refractive surgery-practice location, years in practice, primary surgery setting, and average annual volume of cataract surgery. RESULTS: The highest number of responses (3019) was collected in 2019, with the lowest (569) received in 2020. The use of presbyopia-correcting and toric IOLs has increased significantly from 2016 to 2021, with certain respondent segments using them more frequently than others. Although optical biometry remains the preferred method for obtaining preoperative measurements, the use of tomography (Scheimpflug) has significantly increased. In 2021, 61.1% and 44.9% of respondents always performed preoperative checks of the ocular surface before refractive and cataract surgery, respectively. The number of respondents who perform glaucoma surgery has significantly decreased over the years, with an increasing number of delegates reporting having only a medical glaucoma practice. On average, 5.4% of patients with cataract and glaucoma underwent combined minimally invasive glaucoma surgery and cataract procedures in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the Clinical Trends Survey data provides valuable insights into the shifting practice patterns and clinical opinions of ESCRS delegates.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Glaucoma , Lenses, Intraocular , Presbyopia , Humans , Presbyopia/surgery , Surveys and Questionnaires , Glaucoma/surgery
3.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 22(1): 345, 2022 11 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2259474

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cataract surgery is one of the most frequent surgeries in the world. It is a very safe procedure mostly performed under topical anesthesia in outpatients centers. Due to the growing lack of anesthesiologists, cataract surgeries are more frequently performed without an anesthesiologist present in the operating room. Although extremely rare, life-threatening complications may occur. CASES PRESENTATION: We report two cases of cataract surgery complicated by severe hypotension that required emergency resuscitation in the immediate postoperative period and hospitalization in intensive care unit. Anaphylactic shock was confirmed in the first case and suspected in the second. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Even though cataract surgery is a very safe procedure, it is essential to ensure the presence of an anesthesiologist to manage potential, though extremely rare, life-threatening complications such as anaphylactic reactions.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Hypotension , Humans , Anesthetics, Local , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Cataract Extraction/adverse effects , Cataract Extraction/methods , Postoperative Period , Hypotension/etiology
4.
BMJ Open Qual ; 12(1)2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2234596

ABSTRACT

We report on the establishment of "general anaesthesia (GA) to local anaesthesia (LA) conversion" or GALA initiative at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Through GALA initiative, long waiters for cataract surgery under GA or LA with intravenous sedation were counselled for LA surgery. With careful surgical planning and personalised solutions to LA barriers, LA-converted patients reported good visual and surgical experience outcomes. The GALA initiative reduced cataract surgery waiting times of participants by 11 weeks and increased GA list capacity by three to four theatre lists in its four months of pilot run. This initiative did not limit training opportunities for ophthalmology trainees whose training was affected significantly during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Ophthalmology , Humans , Anesthesia, Local , Anesthesia, General
5.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 22382, 2022 12 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2186052

ABSTRACT

We investigated the proportions of immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) and unilateral cataract surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and compared visual outcomes between the two groups in a tertiary hospital in South Korea. We reviewed 441 cataract surgeries performed between March 1, 2021, and October 31, 2021, at Korea University Guro Hospital by a single surgeon (J.S.S). Medical records of demographics, preoperative visual acuity, corneal astigmatism, axial length, preoperative spherical equivalent, preoperative target (using Barrett's Universal 2 formula), postoperative visual acuity, postoperative refractive error, and postoperative complications were evaluated. Among all patients, 322 (73.0%) eyes underwent ISBCS, and 119 (27.0%) eyes underwent unilateral cataract surgery. The preoperative corrective distance visual acuity (CDVA) was lower in the unilateral cataract surgery group (0.40 ± 0.45 logMAR) than the ISBCS group (0.28 ± 0.16 logMAR, P = 0.008), whereas there was no significant difference in postoperative CDVA between the two groups (0.06 ± 0.10 logMAR vs. 0.07 ± 0.16 logMAR, P = 0.63). There was also no difference in the absolute refractive error between the two groups (0.46 ± 0.37 diopters [D] vs. 0.42 ± 0.38 D, P = 0.63). The preoperative CDVA (P = 0.000) was the significant factor influencing absolute refractive error (r = 0.191, P < 0.001). There was no difference in complications between the two groups, although two patients in the ISBCS group complained of postoperative strabismus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Phacoemulsification , Refractive Errors , Humans , Tertiary Care Centers , COVID-19/complications , Cataract Extraction/adverse effects , Refractive Errors/complications , Cataract/complications , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Phacoemulsification/adverse effects
7.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 70(11): 3779-3784, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2100020

ABSTRACT

Cataract is the most common cause of avoidable blindness in the world. While cataract surgery is continually evolving, manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) still remains highly relevant, especially with the threat of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) still looming large over the world. MSICS today has a renewed significance, since it does not involve the use of any advanced machinery and relies mainly on easily sterilizable instruments, thereby making it a safe and inexpensive option. A self-sealing valvular tunnel entry forms the basis of MSICS, and proper positioning and construction of the tunnel is imperative to the success of the surgery. With more and more people demanding spectacle independence after surgery, it becomes important to have a thorough understanding of the factors that may influence surgically induced astigmatism in MSICS. These include the incision location, size and shape, configuration of the sclero-corneal tunnel, pre-existing ocular pathology, role of sutures, amongst others. With proper knowledge, many of these factors can be modulated to achieve best results.


Subject(s)
Astigmatism , COVID-19 , Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Surgical Wound , Humans , Astigmatism/diagnosis , Astigmatism/etiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cataract Extraction/adverse effects , Cataract Extraction/methods , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Cataract/complications , Surgical Wound/complications
8.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 48(2): 157-161, 2022 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2070178

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and predictability of cataract extraction with toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) or mushroom penetrating keratoplasty (PK). SETTING: Villa Igea Hospital, Forlì, Italy. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Toric IOL implantation was offered to patients with cataract, corneal astigmatism >1.5 diopters (D) and regular central corneal topography after complete suture removal. Phacoemulsification was performed through a 2.4 mm scleral tunnel and an enVista monofocal toric MX60T or Eyecryl monofocal toric IOL was inserted in the capsular bag. Main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, total prediction error, and IOL misalignment. RESULTS: 37 consecutive patients who had previously undergone either DALK (n = 27, 73%) or 2-piece mushroom PK (n = 10, 27%) were included. All patients completed the 6-month follow-up. The mean toric IOL power was 5.3 ± 1.1 D. Both UDVA and CDVA significantly improved (from 1.02 ± 0.27 to 0.46 ± 0.31 logMAR and from 0.65 ± 0.27 to 0.11 ± 0.12 logMAR, respectively; P < .001). 20 eyes (54%) reached UDVA ≥20/40, whereas 35 eyes (95%) reached a CDVA ≥20/40. Final refractive astigmatism was 0.93 ± 0.87 D, with 35 eyes (95%) within 2 D. Prediction error was ≤1 D in 18 eyes (49%). Absolute IOL misalignment was 3.3 ± 3.5 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Toric IOL implantation in postkeratoplasty eyes allowed reduction of refractive astigmatism to predictably low levels with concomitant improved visual outcomes.


Subject(s)
Astigmatism , Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Lenses, Intraocular , Phacoemulsification , Astigmatism/surgery , Humans , Keratoplasty, Penetrating , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Refraction, Ocular
9.
Public Health Res Pract ; 32(3)2022 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2067393

ABSTRACT

Cataract surgery is a safe, effective and common elective procedure in Australia but access is inequitable. True waiting times for cataract care are undisclosed or inconsistently reported by governments. Estimates of true waiting times range from 4 to 30 months and have been extended during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Comparative analysis revealed that reducing waiting periods from 12 to 3 months would result in estimated public health system cost savings of $6.6 million by preventing 50 679 falls. Investment in public cataract services to address current unmet needs would prevent avoidable vision impairment and associated negative consequences.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Australia/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cataract/epidemiology , Humans , Waiting Lists
10.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 48(1): 3-7, 2022 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2042649

ABSTRACT

In an online survey of >1200 global cataract surgeons, 66% were using intracameral (IC) antibiotic prophylaxis. This compared with 50% and 30% in the 2014 and 2007 surveys, respectively. Irrigation bottle infusion and intravitreal injection was each used by only 5% of respondents. For IC antibiotics, vancomycin was used by 6% in the United States (52% in 2014), compared with 83% for moxifloxacin (31% in 2014). Equal numbers used compounded moxifloxacin or the Vigamox bottle as the source. There was a decrease in respondents using preoperative (73% from 85%) and postoperative (86% from 97%) topical antibiotic prophylaxis; the latter was not used by 24% of surgeons injecting IC antibiotics. Reasons cited by those not using IC antibiotics include mixing/compounding risk (66%) and being unconvinced of the need (48%). However, 80% believe having a commercially approved IC antibiotic is important; if reasonably priced, this would increase adoption of IC prophylaxis to 93%.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Endophthalmitis , Eye Infections, Bacterial , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Endophthalmitis/drug therapy , Endophthalmitis/prevention & control , Eye Infections, Bacterial/drug therapy , Eye Infections, Bacterial/prevention & control , Humans , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
N Z Med J ; 135(1553): 91-98, 2022 04 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1897649

ABSTRACT

Cataract surgery is a highly cost-effective treatment, but the surgical intervention rate in New Zealand ranks poorly compared with other high-income countries. The combination of a growing and ageing population, lost operating time due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and geographical disparities, is driving up an unmet demand for cataract surgery. We present several evidence-based strategies with overlapping benefits in access, equity, efficiency and sustainability. Key strategies include that Health New Zealand mandate a national prioritisation threshold for surgical access, and that PHARMAC leverage cheaper access to surgical supplies using nationally agreed equipment standards, establishing high-throughput cataract units, offering same day bilateral cataract surgery when appropriate, and rationalising post-operative care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cataract Extraction , Cataract , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cataract/epidemiology , Humans , New Zealand/epidemiology , Pandemics/prevention & control
13.
Ulster Med J ; 91(1): 19-25, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1824461

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The delivery of cataract surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic is challenging because of the risk of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection when patients attend hospital for elective care. In order to ascertain the risk to patients awaiting cataract surgery, this study aimed to identify the presence of systemic comorbidities that are associated with a high risk of severe disease or death due to COVID-19. METHODS: A prospective study of 315 patients (630 eyes) was conducted from 3rd June to 31st July 2020. An electronic health record was used to identify any systemic comorbidities that would render a patient 'clinically extremely vulnerable' to COVID-19, as outlined by the Department of Health for Northern Ireland. Patient demographics, best-corrected visual acuity (VA) and risk of postoperative anisometropia were also recorded. RESULTS: The median age of patients awaiting cataract surgery was 76 years (range 22-97). Of the 315 patients, 72% were aged over 70 and 16% were aged over 85. A systemic comorbidity that would confer high risk status was identified in 21% of patients. This high risk status was attributable to severe respiratory disease, cancer, and immunosuppression therapies in the majority of cases. The high risk group were younger than those deemed non-high risk, but there were no significant differences with respect to gender, anticipated degree of surgical difficulty, VA, or whether the patient was undergoing first or second eye surgery. Of those patients awaiting first eye cataract surgery, the mean VA in the listed eye was 0.84 logMAR and 39% (70/179) had a VA <0.3 logMAR (6/12 Snellen acuity) in their fellow eye. 57% of patients were awaiting first eye surgery, and 32% of those patients would be at risk of symptomatic anisometropia postoperatively. CONCLUSION: One-fifth of patients awaiting cataract surgery were found to be at high risk of severe disease or death from COVID-19 and these patients may experience delays in their surgical care. Additional planning is required in order to minimise the morbidity associated with delayed cataract surgery.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cataract/epidemiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Waiting Lists , Young Adult
15.
Front Public Health ; 10: 788384, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1775993

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To evaluate the eye-related quality of life (ER-QOL), functional vision, and their determinants in children following congenital and developmental cataract surgery, as the impact on their families, using the Pediatric Eye Questionnaire (PedEyeQ). Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study involving 107 children (aged 0-11 years) with congenital and developmental cataracts who had undergone surgery, as well as 59 visually healthy controls (aged 0-11 years). One parent for each child completed either the Proxy 0-4 PedEyeQ, the Proxy 5-11 PedEyeQ, or the Parent PedEyeQ, depending on their child's age. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were then conducted to compare the differences between groups and to analyze their determinants. Results: PedEyeQ scores were found to be lower in postoperative children with congenital and developmental cataracts compared with the control group across all study domains. The PedEyeQ Proxy 0 to 4 years' greatest mean difference was 27 points worse in the Functional Vision domain (95% CI -34 to -19; p < 0.001). We also found that the occurrence of nystagmus (p < 0.005) and strabismus (p < 0.005) were the major factors affecting participants' functional vision. The PedEyeQ Proxy 5 to 11 years' greatest mean difference was 23 points worse in this same domain (95% CI -30 to -15; p < 0.001), with nystagmus (p < 0.05) being the main determinant herein. Parent PedEyeQ 0 to 4 years' greatest difference was 46 points worse on the Worry about their Child's Eye Condition domain (95% CI -57 to -36; p < 0.001). Similarly, parents of children with ophthalmologic abnormalities, including nystagmus (p < 0.001) and strabismus (p < 0.05), were significantly more worried about their children's eye condition. Parent PedEyeQ 5 to 11 years' greatest difference was also found to be 30 points worse on the Worry about their Child's Eye Condition domain (95% CI -43 to -17; p < 0.005). Conclusions: Children who have undergone congenital and developmental cataract surgery experience a lower quality of life and reduced functional vision. Their families are also significantly and adversely affected herein. Thus, more attention is needed on these groups, with more focused measures being administered to both children and their families.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Cataract/congenital , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
Cornea ; 41(2): 224-231, 2022 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1625425

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection after corneal transplantation surgery, with cataract surgeries as controls, and the impact of the novel coronavirus disease pandemic in the clinical and surgical complications of corneal transplantation and cataract surgeries. METHODS: A retrospective matched case-control study of 480 consecutive individuals who underwent surgery at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between May 2020 and November 2020. A total of 240 patients who underwent corneal transplantation with tissue obtained from the Florida Lions Eye Bank were age, race, ethnicity, and sex matched with 240 patients who underwent cataract surgery during the same day and by the same surgical team. Only the first corneal transplant or cataract surgery during this period was considered for each individual. All donors and recipients were deemed SARS-CoV-2 negative by a nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction test before surgery. Postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infections were defined as previously SARS-CoV-2(-) individuals who developed symptoms or had a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test during the first postoperative month. RESULTS: Mean age, sex, race, and ethnicity were similar between groups. There were no differences between the corneal transplant and cataract groups in the rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection before (5.8% vs. 7.5%, P= 0.6) or after surgery (2.9% vs. 2.9%, P = 1). The rates of postoperative complications did not increase during the pandemic, compared with previously reported ranges. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection was similar for individuals undergoing corneal transplantation or cataract surgery. Further research is required to evaluate the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through corneal tissue.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cataract Extraction , Corneal Transplantation , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Case-Control Studies , Eye Banks/statistics & numerical data , Female , Florida/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Tissue Donors/statistics & numerical data , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical data
19.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 69(12): 3704-3708, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1538659

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the various innovative surgical training techniques prevalent among ophthalmology residents in India during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study. An online survey questionnaire was completed by ophthalmology residents from different parts of the country. The survey consisted of questions related to the impact of the pandemic on training, innovative training techniques adapted during the pandemic and their effectiveness, and COVID-19 duty-related information. RESULTS: A total of 147 responses were obtained. The mean age was 29.3 years (range: 24-40 years, SD: ±3.82). Of which, 87 (59.2%) respondents were females. A total of 61 (41.5%) respondents reported practicing steps of ocular surgeries on goat eye, 69 (46.9%) on model eye/vegetables/fruits, 30 (20.4%) on surgical simulators, and 26 (17.7%) utilized 3-D virtual images and videos. In addition, 22 (15%) respondents reported never using any such techniques. Furthermore, 130 (88.4%) respondents reported practicing steps of cataract surgery, 52 (35.4%) practiced steps of open globe repair, and steps of trabeculectomy were reported by 24 (16.3%). The steps that were reported to be practiced most are incision or tunnel construction by 108 (73.5%), suturing by 92 (62.6%), capsulorrhexis by 91 (61.9%), primary wound repair by 82 (55.8%), and conjunctival peritomy by 75 (51%). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that residents across the country are adapting to the present scenario by utilizing several innovative methods to sharpen their surgical acumen. The current pandemic situation can serve as an impetus to emphasize upon the institutes and medical regulatory bodies to appropriately remodel the residency curriculum.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cataract Extraction , Internship and Residency , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Pandemics , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires
20.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 69(12): 3643-3647, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1538650

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To study the changing trends in the morphology of cataracts at a tertiary eye care center in South India due to COVID-19 pandemic-related national lockdown. Methods: A retrospective study conducted at a tertiary eye care center in Andhra Pradesh state of South India, which included 1724 patients (1753 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery at our center during April 2019-July 2019 (1298 eyes of 1271 patients) and April 2020-July 2020 (455 eyes of 453 patients). Factors studied included preoperative lens status, associated phacodonesis or subluxation, pupil size, other eye lens status, associated retinal problems, glaucoma, and complications during surgery. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal clarity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and disc status at postoperative day 1, 1 week, and 1-month visits were compared. Results: A significantly lower proportion of nuclear sclerosis (decreased from 83.2% in last year before lockdown to 55.2% during lockdown) and significantly higher proportions of mature, brown, or black cataract and phacomorphic, phacolytic, or Morgagnian cataract (increased from 15.5% in last year before lockdown to 43.8% during lockdown) were observed. The proportion of small-incision cataract surgery decreased significantly (from 63.2% to 57.4%), whereas the proportion of phacoemulsification increased significantly (from 35.9% to 41.5%) during lockdown as compared to last year. A significantly higher proportion of eyes with small pupils and association with retinal pathology were also observed during the lockdown. Conclusion: During the national lockdown, there was a shift from nuclear sclerosis grade toward mature, brown, black grade of cataracts. In addition, the proportion of small-incision cataract surgery decreased significantly whereas the proportion of phacoemulsification increased significantly during the lockdown. More number of cataracts with small pupils and associated retinal pathology were observed during the lockdown.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Phacoemulsification , Cataract/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Pandemics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL